Ah yes, the notoriously left wing BBC… My eyes are rolling so hard they may fall out of my head.
Compared to American news, yeah. :P
That’s the thing though.
… um … not sure how to finish this
That’s the neat thing. You don’t. Omniman.jpg
As someone mentioned by american standards its certainly left.
Except for anything related to Gaza/Palestine/Israel.
deleted by creator
You’re not measuring by what percentage of Trump stories are positive/negative, the only metric that matters to him.
This just begs the question of who “Newsguard” is and why anyone should trust them.
There’s dozens of conservative sites that do these ratings for right wing crap and give them high scores, too.
They have an About page that links to who they are and the criteria they use.
Just because conservatives have a shitty evil version doesn’t mean every rating is untrustworthy.
Nutrition Label…? Is that just a cute name for the full details?
.
(Not you)
Said the guy who produces fake news 24/7.
The US government shouldn’t be relied on for credible or reliable information.
They can’t be relied on for anything.
Can’t even be relied on to feed it’s people.
The biggest fucking joke of an empire in human history.
We tried giving people boots with straps to pull themselves up, but that didn’t work either.
Nobody knew it would be so complicated.
Liar they made us buy those boots
Incredibly bleak, given how much they’ve historically invested in demographic, scientific, and economic data analysis.
But even when you look back on that data and information, the majority of it was skewed and manipulated to conform to and confirm a very specific set of values, politics and beliefs … much of whom didn’t have the best interests of people but rather in coddling corporate interests, the economy, money and power.
While that may be true, I think it’s also generally correct that the information was generally based on objective reality, even if the interpretation was skewed. Now, they are just making up information, and using it to support that narrative they wanted. It’s easier when you can skip objective reality to make up the story you want, and continue to repeat it as indisputable fact
Whenever I see things like this it reminds me of Ben Shapiro accusing Andrew Niel of being on the left instead answering the question.
Does she read his diaper shit like tea leaves to determine what is true?
Reading? No. Tasting? Yes.
Miss Leavitt is the reason that dumb blonde jokes actually exist.
Miss? She’s not even married? How is it that she is accepted by her fellow fascists?
They think they have a chance.
And since they treat women like property, I would be wholly unsurprised if the whole Trump administration is full of classic American workplace sexual harassment, Mad Men-style.
At least mentally she is a miss. As in miss by a mile…
if shes not wearing her lying cross on her neck you know if shes not telling the truth or not.
she also wears a pretty big cross that swells everytime she lies.
Didn’t Donny post an AI video of him flying a jet and dropping shit on protesters? Didn’t Donny post an AI video of himself playing guitar?
How is calling a news network fake not lible and opening up the government to be sued?
It’s spoken, so it would be slander. Libel is printed.
But they wouldn’t really have much to gain by suing. They’re not losing business because of this.
deleted by creator
Shes a little piglet.
Waiting for the first nation to label the US Government as a rogue state.
It would be kind of ridiculous for them to publicly announce that. You can call Iran a rogue state because what are they going to do about it?
Publicly calling out the US is a bit more dangerous.
Ma’am, excuse me but, you’re a fucking idiot.
That is the highest compliment you can give a news outlet. Great work BBC.
BBC should report that.
Ah, the liar paradox
It’s always funny when the BBC report things about themselves. They always talk about themselves as if they’re a third party.
“The BBC understands that the BBC is been sued”
