Because appeaemt doesn’t work?

They’re not willing to engage in good faith. If they were they never would have started the “special operations” in the first place. Nor would they be asking to keep all of their gains in the war.

Just admit your not accepting proof.

You took someone’s proof, and just stuck your head in the sand without actually addressing anything.

That’s what makes this bad faith. It has nothing to do with smarts.

But thata exactly the point. Your not willing to accept any proof. So why should someone bother?

It’s bad faith arguing.

I know exactly what proof it’d take to convince me the world is flat. And it’s a simple explanation for all current observable effects.

No one has yet.

So asking for proof, AND setting the bar of that I’d accept is part of the burden of proof.

It’s also a bad faith question to prove someone’s thoughts.

Let me ask you this, what proof would you accept?

Not the person your arguing with.

How about allowing journalists in to document?