Two points of contention:

1. Hunting for sport isn’t ethical in any form. There’s no way to say that killing for fun is an ethical activity. Which is not to say that hunting is unethical, even if you have other sources of food available, as long as you (or somebody) are eating what you kill.
2. If you’re going to kill for food, it’s most ethical to do it in the most painless way possible. I would argue that this assertion makes hunting more ethical than most modern forms of farming. But making things more “sporting” isn’t ethical if you start using tools or methods that you’re not skilled with (and likely to wound or maim instead of cleanly killing). If you’re killing something to eat it, don’t torture and play with it, just kill it.

It might even be worth not filing to dismiss the suit just to get to discovery and see what juicy newsworthy nuggets float up.

If Trump was a foreign asset, would he have done anything differently?

Doesn’t sound like a very safe room. But anyway, imagine even having to have a safe room because you have to live in fear of the people whose land you stole standing up for themselves.