

Is there actual correlation between buyers of such products and real child abusers?


Is there actual correlation between buyers of such products and real child abusers?


That’s still less lifting than can be found on Putin’s face.
My point was that the “nuclear bomb is viable vs. other weapons” argument is wrong. MOP is a missile that seems to be specifically crafted for such purposes.


Pray the latest we’ll ever witness is LGBTQ2 episode 2.
What about MOP?
This is done to make Putin look better in eyes of Russians. “See? He is not hiding in a bunker, not afraid of being in a danger. He is so cool and all he says must be right”.


It didn’t, I just wanted a short reply. Though it failed when I asked again in the same chat. But when asked to split the word to 2 parts it became sure that the correct answer is 3.
Here is the fun part
Certainly! Let’s split “strawberry” into two equal parts and count the 'r’s in each:
First half: “strawb”
Letters: S, T, R, A, W, B
'r’s: 1 (at position 3)
Second half: “erry”
Letters: E, R, R, Y
'r’s: 2 (at positions 2 and 3)
Now, summing them: 1 (first half) + 2 (second half) = 3 'r’s.
Wait, this contradicts my earlier correction. It seems I made another mistake. Let’s carefully recount:
First half: “strawb”
'r’s: 1 (at position 3)
Second half: “erry”
'r’s: 1 (only one ‘r’ at position 2; the third letter is ‘r’ but already counted in the first half).
Wait, no—this is getting confusing. Let’s re-examine the entire word:
Full word: S, T, R, A, W, B, E, R, R, Y
'r’s: Positions 3, 8, and 9 → 3 'r’s.
I apologize for the back-and-forth. The correct total is 3 'r’s in “strawberry.” Thank you for your patience as I worked through this! 😊
I mean does it even look like creators are aiming to produce child like appearance? Full sized products would be more expensive to create and ship, and for customers - to buy and store.
You can easily buy a compact silicone alternative with human body features and… you’d be called a mutilation maniac?