It’s googles but with kagi.com, a search engine

The Donald J Trump Raped Children Ballroom. Or just “the ballroom” if you’re into the whole brevity thing. (Who the hell would ever use the “full” name?)

They demanded bodies, then Hamas promised to deliver them, then Israel threatened to cut off all aid if they didn’t deliver the bodies, then Trump threatened to bomb Palestinians if they didn’t deliver the bodies, then Hamas delivered the bodies.

The exact opposite of how you get extremists like Hamas to stand down. They’re demanding Hamas disarm while demonstrating the war isn’t over.

I don’t get the idea of deliberately putting people in the jungle where there are no rules or morals or purpose out there… and then getting angry or surprised when they lash out at society.

The reasons someone shouldn’t murder you live in society. X, Y, Z are why you don’t hurt others, and XYZ don’t exist in the jungle.

We should only throw people out that are worth destroying, like Nazis.

Try adding more text to your context window, or switch to a model with more parameters. Assuming the text seems unparsable to your setup.

Who is Christopher Columbus? Is he friends with Epstein and Trump?

If it’s the same project then they are using AI to reconstruct faces, finding matches on social media, then they scan the social media for real evidence. Something like parallel construction or fusion centers except they start with synthetic “evidence” before discovering real evidence.

They take advantage of the fact many people don’t realize you can easily bring up someone’s Facebook by scanning their face. I don’t think they can find ICE members who are secretive and careful, but it’s unlikely many ICE members are that meticulous.

“we can’t release the doctors because they might be Hamas”

They’re literally dealing with Hamas. That’s like saying “we can’t release these soldiers because they might be Israeli”

If they’re just a terrorist organization that doesn’t even deserve pow swaps then what is this ceasefire

It’s meta like everything else. Sure, there are relatively simple rules that ought to lead to obvious, inexorable outcomes. But people are in charge and they’re thinking: But what would it mean?

Give the Peace Prize to Putin! Maybe it will slow him down.

Give the Peace Prize to Kissinger! Maybe our empathetic embrace will soften his demeanor.

Give the Peace Prize to a conservative nut job. Let’s throw in some support for fostering democratic values.

She’s supposedly an opposition leader trying to jumpstart democracy, yet she invites external aggression which makes people crazy enough to tear down existing democratic institutions. Her dictatorship is going to crumble so she needed to prop it up with the spectre of US aggression?

When you are investigating autism but you’re conservative: have we considered children’s genitals?

What does this little boy’s Ja Rule have to say about this?

These dudes joined the strongest gang for a chance to kill people and make some money. And now they’re not getting money.

With how little you need to give a soldier before it thinks it’s doing good, I wonder how long until they start Defending Freedom™ against Americans.

It’s fucked up how you didn’t call me names and run, you weren’t a conversational dead end; all you did was disagree and explain your reasoning… and people respond by downvoting. “You’ve been deducted 6 social credit for not hating MAGA enough.” But at least the points don’t matter yet.

Well if people start executing ICE I’m not going to say anything about it.

It’s like how you aren’t legally required to render aid in California. If I saw a wrecked car with a maga bumper sticker, then I didn’t see a wrecked car ;)

Conservatives are the radical left. It’s just words.

Gaza? The thing that has been happening for decades? The thing the world doesn’t care about?

Or Gaza©, the brand new thing that is super important and which needs to be solved by the next Democrat or else we might as well not vote?

I’ve been alive for awhile so I know there’s at least two “Israel - Palestine” concepts people talk about.

Musk pulled his dick out in front of a woman and then said he would buy her a horse if she didn’t tell anyone.

So we know for a fact that he’s willing to commit sex crimes and then manipulate people into staying quiet.

Musk could rape on a plane without having to go to the island.

Protesting isn’t being in the real world.

Remember MAGA protests / “stop the count”? There is no requirement for protesters to engage with reality.

The real world is actually doing things. Instead of yelling at people to pick up trash, you pick it up. Instead of yelling at people to fix Gaza, you begin the process.

Literally the best case of protesting is that someone else gets up to do things.

What is wrong about what she said?

Normally you imagine positive change behind protesting, and you probably assumed that when you read “protesters”, but not every occurrence of “making a scene” is constructive.

She isn’t the president. She’s yet to map out the road ahead.

People are used to being helpless and pathetic so they don’t even consider anything other than “protesting.” But what about building policy and bringing it to her? Why not start a dialogue? Why not map out bits of that road ahead? Why not consider experts who could help the next Democratic admin? Why not study policy yourself? Why not go form connections with humanitarian groups? Or join them?? Why not go talk to people and bring that wealth of data to her?

Why not HELP and CONTRIBUTE? If you just want to YELL then go yell at the people in charge.

China is when Chinese people do things Americans have been doing.

NSA, Equation Group, black rooms, PRISM, Palantir… that’s bad stuff but it’s sorta in the background. Even the national surveillance startup tracking license plates and soon people… not that interesting.

But Chinese that stuff? It’s the only way you can show many Americans just how fucked these policies / institutions are.