Now that would be a hell of a timeline.

Amazing, you give them links and citations they still ignore you.

Russia has advanced drones that can’t be detected now, I guess?

“Hey can we have evidence?”

“You want evidence? You’re defending them!”

“…Sorry for this but we’re in court right now, you can’t just accuse people of crimes.”

“WHO ELSE COULD HAVE DONE THIS?”

“No idea, let’s figure it out with logic and reasoning. Maybe we can track the drones and -”

“I’ve heard enough, guilty.”

Well lemme know when we find the yellowcake uranium, since not finding it is proof they’re hiding it.

What a weird thing to have happen, sorry to hear that.

Because that would be evil, somehow. Instead let’s wildly speculate and go with whatever seems likely in the fog of war and misinformation.

Sure it’s likely, but again:

God forbid we want proof before we invade a country.

Meanwhile in the 1910s:

Can you think of ANYONE ELSE with anything to gain from blowing up the USS Maine besides Spain?

Meanwhile in the Gulf of Tonkin:

Can you think of ANYONE ELSE with anything to gain from this besides Vietnam?

If it’s Russia, let’s do something about it. Hopefully something more than a slap on the wrist while sitting buying their oil and natural gas.

But if we don’t have proof, we’re just doing the Operation Iraqi Liberation again based on false information.

No don’t ask for tracking drones and evidence! That’s evil and wrong!

Just agree with the media and the state, they’ve never manufactured a war out of nothing before. Especially not in the age of misinformation .

The fact that asking for proof gets you downvoted means this place is hungry for war.

God forbid we want proof before we invade a country. Surely someday we’ll find that yellowcake uranium.

Weird how they projected about you, then said you projected. And then got mad at you for what they did.

You literally are projecting right now. What is this, Republican logic?

The DNC hasn’t run it’s bots up yet today /j