gon [he]

Check my reviews out at [email protected] or [email protected].
I’m slowly starting to post on the .ee one…


Also @[email protected] and @[email protected].

  • 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2023

help-circle







  • Nowhere did I claim that billionaires are good.

    Of course, nor did I mean to imply you did so!

    I do get your point, and, on the surface level, I agree. However, I think it’s an inferior analysis of the situation.

    Take your tiger metaphor; naturally, the rabid and hungry one is the most dangerous. Nevertheless, as you pointed out, they are both existential problems. I simply can’t celebrate, be satisfied, or even be appeased by the knowledge that we’re harbouring a hungry tiger, no matter what hungry and rabid tiger we may avoid by doing so. That’s my point.

    It does seem we’re on the same page about this, to be honest… It’s just that your initial reply seemed a little — how do I put it… — irrelevant? It’s the Maxim of Quantity. We both agree that billionaires are fundamentally problematic, then why did you go and specify which ones are worse?


    1. “Here’s a bowl of cereal. By the way, I didn’t piss in it.”

    Yeah… I get that, but why would you even bring that up? Why say that? It doesn’t imply that you’re someone that pisses in cereal, but it does give off that feeling.

    1. “Billionaires are bad. By the way, that kind of billionaire is worse.”

    Yeah… I get that, but why would you even bring that up? Why say that? It doesn’t imply that you’re someone that thinks billionaires are good, but it does give off that feeling.


    Do you pick up what I’m putting down?!






  • No, it most certainly is true. The left has decided that it’s acceptable and encouraged to stoop to the level of their enemies. You probably disagree with this because it’s a hard truth you don’t want to acknowledge; don’t worry, I see it all the time.

    Sigh, there’s no stats on this, so I’ll refrain from further discussion…

    It’s a waste of time and an effective distraction from what we should be doing instead.

    Well.





  • If you ask the average leftist on English-speaking internet forums

    Seems pretty obvious you haven’t actually interacted with an average leftist, let me tell you, because that is not true…

    I’ll say though, I’m torn, but leaning towards thinking this really wasn’t that bad. There’s a difference between allowing right-wing policy and opening the door to fascism. Should poison be allowed to run for main course?

    Călin Georgescu seems to be a pretty clear-cut fascist, to be honest.




  • This is the most reasonable assessment in my opinion.

    I wasn’t really assessing anything per se, more so asking a genuine question about whether this kind of thing should happen. I’ll say, I know Lemmy can be a little… Politically interesting… But I was not expecting downvotes for such a mild reply.

    But yeah, I’ve actually been thinking about this for quite a while. I really think that, if we want leftist policies implemented, we really do need a charismatic candidate and a compelling narrative that can compete with what the right is pushing.