Do we think they’ll be less likely to throw luggage. Cause if yes, they have my full support.

But if you know the answer, are you not also logically the best person to ask?

I wonder about the circumstances of their deaths, and the nature of their characters.

It wouldn’t surprise me if they were unliked for some reason and intentionally sacrificed.

Heck, it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that our king killed them himself for sport then went to war with Iran just to explain their deaths.

So, who profits from this?

What is a Zionist and why does one thirst for blood.

It’d actually be cool if I could verify age with one service and receive an anonymous auth token and create a pin or password, then just use those everywhere to verify age.

Or put it in my password manager and auto fill the BS on request.

All without sharing any private or identifying info with the service.

Currently I either just don’t use web services that require age verification, or I use a VPN to bypass them.

Join or support a co-op or credit union today.

Preferably a non-profit, but even most for-profit co-ops are a huge step in the right direction where W+ is concerned.

Being able to win a primary does not equate to be electable. It just shows party preference. To be elected the candidate needs to be preferred by all voters.

Smart parties pick the best endgame player.

Like a sports team winning early games in a national competition, that doesn’t mean they are good enough to walk away the champions.

Overall fitness, excellence, and likability must be considered vs the other opponents on the final ballot.

The truest of US winners.

Tax payer money!

Love your icon, BTW.

I’d be interested to know if that’s true.

I’ve seen plenty of both misandry and misogyny.

I’ve only seen misandry so far on this thread.

It would be pretty upsetting if who saw what was deliberate in order to manipulate the viewers.

Girls do this shit too, and it’s not new.

The general message to ‘be good to each other’ is very old, and has to be told often. The internet provides for a lot of anonymity and seperation from consequence, so allows for people to say shitty things without the moderation that’s more common in public and personal spaces.

It’s not surprising at all that there is tons of men or women online talking shit about each other. What is surprising is that the platforms it happens on don’t just delete that crap as a rule. Many will let it fester and negatively effect the community because people interact with it, and interaction means ad hits.

We need laws that make monetizing such content illegal, to encourage it’s quick removal.

Just bitching about having to see it isn’t good enough.

The correct terminology depends on context.

As others have mentioned, when they said woman there they were referring to the present report of a woman, who was a teen and the time of the event.

Calling an adult female human a woman is not wrong.

Calling a teen a teen is not wrong.

Legally teens under 18 are also children.

Technically everyone is someone’s child.

Though not considered adults by most laws, biologically people become adults after puberty, which varies by individual. The period during puberty they are adolescents, neither children nor yet adults.

Context matters.

There’s a distinct difference between how some of these terms are used depending on context. There is biological status and then there is legal status.

So be careful where & when you take issue.

Here, legal terms are appropriate due to the subject matter, and you should definitely suggest to the authors that they adjust the terms used accordingly.

Just complaing to the ether may be cathartic, but inaction is also complicit.

However teen is a teen regardless of context, as it’s a designation of age group, not a legal or biological classification. So it’s up to the reader to determine relevance of the teens age beyond that.

Not exactly, it doesn’t mean the fed can just do whatever it wants, it means lower laws can’t overrule higher ones, and puts the fed in the position to moderate conflicts between lower laws or contracts between parties that fall under federal law.

The fed doesn’t have a law that specifically allows for the inhuman treatment of detanies, it has a law against it.

Local laws can be made more strict than fed laws, so long as they don’t violate constitutional protections.

So the state or county or city, whichever is relevant, can’t pass and maintain specific laws pertaining to the quality of human detainment facilities, and anyone in the territory, even the fed, would be legally obligated to respect that law.

However they could just buy a facility where they were welcome instead. Then the other territories law wouldn’t apply.

Error… Please disregard.

Only?.. We need a public petition.

And a national civil lawsuit vs our gov.

I demand compensation beyond merely my financial losses.

They can cut back on spending on military projects and deals with billion dollar companies and tax the rich.

The money is there.

Conspirators have no balls bra.

Everyone knows this.

I was missing:

• remember to wear your x-ray glasses.