crimson_iris

But that creates a distinction the people in charge can use to deny what’s happening. Now and in the future. “It’s a small group of bad apples, most ICE agents aren’t like that.” Etc. It’s all of them. The whole agency has to go. For that purpose, I think continuing to just call them ICE is useful.

What’s the benefit of not referring to ICE as ICE? What they’re doing should reflect on the organization as a whole. They should not get to say “well they weren’t our agents, I don’t know what you’re talking about.”

Sorry, I’m pretty new to the Fediverse, so I probably did it wrong. Hoping someone will correct me, but in the mean time I’ll quote the person whose comment I meant to link to:

Some of the test sites don’t differentiate between random and unique. They may see a randomized fingerprint as a plausible unique user, but it may be different the next time you visit. Other sites may detect that your browser has taken steps to randomize your fingerprint, and use that as an identifying piece of information on its own (power user vs average joe)

deleted by creator

I’m not sure, but I believe PumaStoleMyBluff’s reply may describe the issue.

I use CanvasBlocker.

Brick, where’d you get a grenade?

The strait is in a superposition of closed and open.

Where there’s a will, there’s a way.