This April, Iran’s attack involving more than 300 drones and missiles, in retaliation for Israel’s killing of seven Iranian officials in Syria, shattered that supposition. That surprised Israel, which had miscalculated the severity of Iran’s response, according to U.S. officials. Israel’s measured response at the time appeared to bring the tit for tat to a conclusion well short of war.

That was a surprise to read. In what world did Israel expect Iran not to retaliate the way they did? Did they really expect Iran to lay down and take whatever Israel dished out? This seems incredibly naive.

He pointed out that his client had pleaded guilty, had shown remorse and had no previous criminal record

That really should not be excusable for something this sick. I’m disturbed just by reading the article.

In this case? Yes. And I know that comes across as biased and naive, but given the IDFs actions and statements from the past year alone. Literally any source would be more credible.

With little to no corroboration or regard for the authenticity of the source as long as it supports your personal bias and preconceived conclusions?

If only the IDF was known for their integrity and respectability. Their reports and information would not need to be corroborated.

In a conversation with an IDF representative, a Gazan civilian described how Hamas terrorists were beating them with sticks

Coming from an IDF representative. Very credible source.

/s