Don’t let me catch you slipping now

It’s okay to talk about killing the homeless and mentally ill.

What is that from?

And you can expect better from a .ml?

You’re siding with a tankie over an anarchist here btw.

Most upvoted comment: Attacking the source - Defending

2nd: No proof, but it’s serious so people wouldn’t lie - Benefit of the Doubt

3rd: “Rare China L” - Criticizing

4th: Attacking source, attacking extent - Defending

5th: “If it is happening it’s probably because of taxes or some legit reason” - Defending

6th: “Making porn is illegal” - Defending

7th: “The whole thing smells a little fishy” - Defending

8th: Attacking source, ‘not inclined to believe it’ - Defending

9th: An author in another country wrote some pedophilic, this is probably the same - Defending

10th: Boo - Criticizing

11th: ‘porn struggle session’ - Unknown what way the comment leans.

12th: A quote from another article - Looks Criticizing

13th and least upvoted: “Hexbear users claim to unconditionally support queer rights and then try to run defence for this shit.” - Criticizing

Defending: 7
Critic: 4 (maybe +2)

Where are you getting 95% from?

All the posts I read were defending or excusing it.

Reality not just shooters: