If the goal is more publicity rather than the aid that had a low chance of making it through, it is very smart to have a world famous influencer aboard.

Why do you assume she endangered the others rather than they chose to take a calculated risk?

Sounds like endorsement to me.

You are so right. We should just leave it be and make no noise.

Better performative than being able to ignore completely.

There is a paper out about reactivation after pasteurization sadly.

https://gifer.com/en/3Ot7z

Not necessarily. If they actually were reformed and the judge wasn’t hearing it, the sentencing wasn’t correct.