it should be a mandatory reporting

This is the only point of this conversation, you agree with it, and yet you continue arguing with the point that you agree on.

Priests don’t do mental health counseling, even if they try, and when they try they bring harm where help should be, but even if they did help, this law, that we all arguing for, would’ve not impede with this, it only required mandatory reporting of instances of child abuse.

not punishing the guy who self reported and tried to get help.

It’s not. What. The. Law. Is. About.

And you’re missing the point of what we’re talking about. Right now, the law allows active child molesters to execute well known religious loophole, where they “confess” their crimes to an unaccounted guy from religious organisation, and this act makes the crime nonexistent according to their proposed worldview. What it actually does, is that it clears the guilt from the perpetrator, allowing him to continue his acts. Knowing history of Catholic church, if it does anything is that it allows child molesters to exchange experiences and tips for future crimes.
Removing all oversight from this process increases the amount of crime going on, and that’s what you’re advocating for.
The point of letting people who didn’t act on their urges to get psychological help they need to continue not act on it, is obviously correct opinion you have. It’s just it doesn’t apply here.

I want to remind you once again, that you are defending actual child abusers. Not just people who have some fucked up desires and not act on them, but actual childfuckers. You are saying that people who already fucked kids should be shielded from law by religion because some other people also want to fuck kids but don’t do that.

The law suppose to make them report child abuse, real one, that happened already. You can talk with your magic provider about how much you want to diddle kids, and he still can do 3% of what real therapist should be doing, if you want. The law was supposed to catch those who already diddle kids. Which nobody should be doing, no matter how much they want to.

Alex Jones is liked by people in Trump’s clique, so he will never face any consequence. He almost faced one, almost, but then America decided that ghouls like him should hold all the power.

Less than 2 month, not a lot. I have 31 by default and it’s the lower end of the norm

Is…is that how you think it’s done?

Lawns aren’t the problem but they are a problem

Sometimes they can control for known variables. I don’t think they did it in this case

Politicians are surprisingly cheap.

EU doesn’t have an immigration crisis, EU has right wing rasict ass neonazi assholes grifters problems, who are using racism and stupidity to gain power. It absolutely doesn’t correlate to anything in reality. You can’t convince those who are afraid of immigrants that not making people into refugees will help. They either hate poor non-white people and happy about the whole war situation, or they’re stupid and don’t have grasp on reality, they were said they refugees are the problem so they accepted it without knowing what that means.
People who oppose human suffering don’t see immigration as a problem.

Hm, never thought about it from this perspective. In this case, penis then. Balls even.

It costs you significantly leas than 25 bucks to not write shit like that

Are you aware of the existence of a videocamera? It’s a cool new thing on the block

No, it’s demonstrably not true. Or do you think nobody ever does protest around the world and we can’t study this shit?
Hell, there was the exact same situation in Ukraine in 2014, it’s one of the best documented revolutions of the current era. Putin’s cronies tried to do provocaterur shit, and shot back, and there was so much backlash to it from everywhere, this ultimately brought them defeat.
I once again want you to recognise the difference between “police mows down a crowd of unarmed protesters” and “police crushed armed insurrection in an intense shootout”, but this time I want you to do it for real, not just knee-jerking canned response.

I just want you to recognise the difference between “police mows down a crowd of unarmed protesters” and “police crushed armed insurrection in an intense shootout”.

One agent in a crowd of unarmed people will not cause that effect. But if everyone is on edge and carrying a gun, then yes, one will be enough to cause full blown massacre.

But that’s the thing. Shooting unarmed protestors is fucked up even by their standards, they aren’t above it, but they have to hide it and not everyone is having a good time about it, so there is tension and hesitation.
Shooting armed protestors is why they joined in the first place, it’s what they dream of, it’s everything that a cop ever wanted.
And a big portion of population that is not OK with the first scenario is also dreaming of the second one.

If you want for the police to get an excuse to mow you down with a tank that is. They so wish some of you have guns so they can kill you and have a ready and ironclad excuse