

It’s not stalking and “probably” shouldn’t rouse a courtroom.


It’s not stalking and “probably” shouldn’t rouse a courtroom.


Which means?


Right? Feels like this is being tacked on as a shot at AI. Otherwise nobody is harmed except the guy. Pedos are ick, but if harmless then why punish? I don’t think anyone should have to take a fall because others think their desires are gross.


Idk. I don’t really pay a lot of attention to talking heads and politics. I just think conflict can be generally over when troublemakers are dead.


I can think of a way to stop them. It’s not a very ethical way though.


Why not all of the genital cutting?


Oh boy here we go.
The best lies have truths sprinkled around them.
Snopes got snoped. Snopes is actually terrible. I’m surprised to see their old reputation is still holding out with some people.
Nobody is a good source. Material needs to stand on it’s own. Everyone has a camera, but only well established sources have high quality photo manipulation.


Oh boy, calling someone a nobody and whining about integrity in the same breath! Literally everyone is just somebody. Believe them based on evidence rather than your simple minded stylistic impressions. Putting on a lab coat doesn’t add any more credibility than putting on a bath robe.


A link is just pointing at someone else saying it. What makes someone else a better source?
Commissioning as in buying? I’m not sure how that changes it to stalking.
IMO, the worst part about it is that there’s someone else out there who thinks less of me because there’s some naked imagery of me.