Lasherz

Not just the poors, he’s a eugenicist, and I’m pretty sure he’d need a muzzle in the same room as Anthony Fauci… well more than he does normally.

Idk about you, but if my neighbor had a bunch of guns and threatened to shoot me if I ever got guns, I’d definitely secretly obtain guns.

He does, but only if a person chosen at random is also in the group chat, along with his whole family.

Phil Butler sure does like gobbling Kremlin cock.

I’m not sure what you mean. It seemed relatively on point.

Jews have not trashed their international goodwill, zionists have. Many Jews show condemnation of the genocide in Gaza and no reservations about calling it that. See: Jewish Voices for Peace. Equating the two is the problem, but it’s not up to the Jews to say, “Not on our name” as much as it is for everyone else to say, “Zionists sure do sound like and act like Nazis.” Jews shouldn’t even have to voice their disdain for the false association because it’s an antisemitic idea created and spread by Zionists and Christian Fascists.

It’s not a competition between Gaza and Ukraine for those of us with a degree of moral consistency.

Perhaps a better example would have been the Uvalde police vs the shooter. People are rightfully mad at the police, but nobody gatekeeps that anger in that instance except police apologists.

If you’re drowning, you don’t look down at the water, you look for a life raft.

What’s potentially more scary is that they garner this defeatism about human rights by way of the United States, so what does that mean for when America does the same thing? Obviously, American imperialism has a long violent history, but its wars have never specifically targeted women, children, aid workers, and journalists. If they did though, apparently they’d all be just as silent as they have been for our extension in the middle east.

It’s both. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you as hard as it might deserve to be bitten. Selection bias is the main thing I see in news. They wouldn’t have that position long if they engaged in wrong-think or pointed the camera in the wrong class’ direction.

It’s pretty much impossible to find an article where the journalist treats the Russian soldiers as unknown or neutral parties and almost just as hard to find articles that give the full statements from the Kremlin without the implication being that it’s not a proper explanatory statement given the situation. The reason is the statements filling the majority of the body are from western sources, which were more reputable in that instance.

To your point on covering Israel, it would be in the interest of telling the story accurately to mention that journalists are vetted through the IDF and all footage is subject to that vetting as well as who is allowed in. The factual model you present breaks down when access is limited, both by the IDF killing journalists and by limiting the eyes on the ground journalists, their equipment, their film, and their employees at every level. If you control the opposition’s ability to communicate reality, then you win under that model, but other news models like what Zeteo does mentions those things and the perspective is prioritized with the proper rarity and reputation that it actually has.

It would also be prudent to mention that Israel has a history of lying about this particular topic. They didn’t have any issues making that claim attachment when Russia was encroaching on Crimea, and the Kremlin was denying it.

What you describe isn’t how it always was. News have grown accustomed to skating by with nothing but police statements, for the most obvious example, to make very bold claims. The obsession with being early and the risk of bucking the system of power only to be proven wrong later has been crippling for media integrity.

It’s sickening how these outlets literally side with a government against their own innocent murdered workers. Some of them would literally side against their lived experience if they narrowly escaped and lived to talk about it. All for a country that perfectly personifies the term “cry-bully.”

They should also call him antisemitic, because his dual loyalty bullshit is precisely that.

Nazis doing Nazi shit.

Dual loyalty trope, very antisemitic of you, Mr. Babykiller.

When Trump is noted to be actively searching for big betrayals every time he gets in hot water like he is with Epstein, then loyalty to the US is a nonstarter. It’s bad enough if he’s squirrel brained, but this implies purposeful throwing a whole country to the wolves literally just for headlines.

Clinton famously attacked another country to distract from the trials with witnesses for Monica Lewinski and successfully pushed it down to page 2. This seems as bad or worse.

There are literally IDF soldiers recording themselves eating the aid… It doesn’t get more depraved than this folks. They should be referred to as modern day Nazis by anyone with a conscience.