no one should ever be allowed to own land or buildings. they should always remain the property of all humans everywhere, and be allocated for use according to need. when that need is no longer there, it should return to be reallocated.
take it up with the UN i suppose, not to mention the various other human rights organizations who have reported on this
no way am i gonna click that link
Use the cameras for target practice, just make sure you’re either not caught on camera or you’re not identifiable. There’s also a bunch of valuable metal inside them, including gold and copper.
As a lifelong Star Wars fan, I enjoyed it. I thought it was fun, the soundtrack was great, the environments were really detailed and cool. The writing was mediocre, but it’s for kids ultimately, so I don’t expect it to be super complex - and it was still better than the Super Mario Galaxy movie for sure. There are more adult-oriented Star Wars content like Andor which is also great, but the kid-friendly content is also good fun if you just accept that it’s content designed for kids!
I’d argue the “left” agrees that the owners of capital play an essential role in most economies nowadays, but also believe that it doesn’t have to be that way.
So… they don’t play an essential role. If we can make do without them, we don’t need them!
My comment was a little tongue-in-cheek, I don’t think leftists truly want billionaires to go live in a mountain. Personally, I’d rather bring them to justice for their crimes against humanity.
Libertarians, most commonly. It’s the plot of their favorite book, Atlas Shrugged, as I mentioned
It’s ironic that the left and the right share the fantasy of Atlas Shrugged: that all of the rich people would fuck off and go live isolated inside a mountain to show how much (little) we need them
It does, it’s called plunder.
The pilots ejected safely,
That’s a shame. Ah well, hopefully the jets are completely scrapped.
inb4 this post gets deleted by pro-zionist lemmy.world mods/admins
The judiciary is, by and large, owned and controlled by the ruling class. Don’t expect anything resembling justice to come from that system.
Without doxing myself, I have expertise in this topic. It’s not a matter of my world view, it’s a matter of science and communication.
It is very unlikely that human adiposity leads to increased cancer risk directly. It is correlational, not causational. Human adiposity itself, isolated from compounding factors, has a complex relationship with health outcomes, and not at all the linear correlation where more fat = more bad that the mainstream likes to pretend.
We know that certain foods, particularly animal products, especially cheaper animal products, lead to cancers, heart disease, etc. This is most likely explanation for the results in this study. But yet again we have yet another study uselessly pointing out a correlation which is unhelpful for actually solving public health issues and continues to encourage the passing of the blame to those in society who have the least responsibility for their situation.
Hate these studies. They’re always just based on correlations, and ignores the elephant in the room: class. How wealthy you are, how wealthy the area you live in, those factors have the highest impact on health outcomes, but the mainstream media (which is owned by the ruling class) will never be honest about that. So they just find correlations that let them blame poor people for having shitty diets.
it’s ok, once the people sieze control, we can issue bounties for their arrest and drag them back to stand trial, then execute these enemies of humanity