FaceDeer

This just in: single-issue activist explains why one issue is the only issue that should be considered in future planning.

FBI Uncovers Al-Qaeda Plot To Just Sit Back And Enjoy Collapse Of United States.

In theory, they can pass this with a veto-proof majority.

In practice, you may have spotted a flaw in the US Constitution here. I’ll add it to the pile.

Or, it’s a way to generate songs about whatever topic or in whatever style that you personally are interested in. That’s what I use it for.

There are plenty of movies where the CGI is creating elements that could well be real, like people or buildings. There was a movie recently where rather than go through the legal hassle of having live horses on set they just CGIed every last shot that contained a horse, even if they were just standing around in the background. You’ve no doubt watched plenty of CGI imagery that you had no idea was CGI. It looked good, that was all.

When you watch a movie with computer-generated special effects, are you happy watching a lie?

If 97% of listeners can’t tell the difference then I’m not sure the point of quibbling the definition.

Unless you enjoy music regardless of whether it’s AI generated, in which case the future’s going to have way more options.

Turns out a lot of people like how it sounds.

You can be the change you want to see.

And also distractions. And to be a “wartime president.” Lots of stuff here.

What do you mean “now?” Americans have had this habit of calling anyone whose politics they disapprove of a “communist” or “socialist” for a very long time.

The funny thing is that we have been doing a lot about it lately, most launch providers these days take care to ensure that their spent boosters reenter and satellite operators include provisions for moving them to graveyard orbits when they’re done.

Except China, who have continued to be rather sloppy when it comes to disposing of their boosters. Maybe this will give them a nudge.

Don’t jump to conclusions. Jimmy’s “intervention” has been largely rejected by the Wikipedia community, and it wasn’t much of an intervention to begin with.

Laws don’t instantly become moot just because there isn’t a police officer standing right in front of you with handcuffs ready to go, and it’s not a good idea to normalize having agencies deciding on an ad-hoc basis “we’re just going to let our rules slide this time.” What if the EPA did that for polluters?

I am in no way supporting this, I’m just pointing out that the problem isn’t as easy or obvious to solve as it seems. They need to change the regulations and there’s a process for that. They should have seen something like this coming and had the regulations account for it to begin with, but they didn’t and now we’re here. Oversights like that happen sometimes.

Did you read the article?

At issue is SNAP’s “Equal Treatment Rule,” which bars stores from either discriminating against people in the program or offering them favorable treatment.

I dug a little further. The SNAP “Equal Treatment Rule” is not a standalone statute passed by Congress, it’s an agency regulation issued by USDA under its authority to administer the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. It is codified in federal regulations (7 C.F.R. Part 274). SNAP itself is authorized by the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. §§ 2011–2036). That law gives USDA broad authority to regulate how benefits are issued and used.

There’s always a few that aren’t, people who can be pried off of the leftward flank.

If you think there aren’t then you might as well start advocating for the dissolution of the United States, because the experiment is over and it’s a failure.

And the bystander was a member of the US military, no less. What a wonderful clip.

Bear in mind, they want this. The bloodlust and cruelty is the point. They think it makes the State “strong”, or something.

Hey, remember that “Jade Helm” thing that the Republicans went completely apeshit over back when Obama was president?

Hm.