ublock origin + bypass-paywalls-clean + consent-o-matic

no u

metareporting on what other “observers” are reporting is not fucking news and if you need a clue look at the fucking slamline. this fucking ‘story’ is literally just some guy who went through bluesky and found a bunch of people who were saying the thing they wanted to say in the first place. nobody got “slammed” goddamnit: it’s not factual, it’s not even editorial, it’s just clickbait.

fmovies.gd

repairing a blown head gasket in a car is often a repair that costs more than the car would be worth. maybe that’s what they meant?

oh i see, there’s no hatred here, my mistake. i’m so fucking stupid it must just be my stupid lying eyes reading all this hatred thats on me.

You take his advice. Empathy is destroying the world and you abandon it.

abandon all hope ye who enter here

Charlie

if?

i’m no fan of charlie kirk, but i was always of the opinion that his “don’t empathize” was actually a dogwhistle for “be open and explicit about your hatred, it’s okay.” are you sure that isn’t what you’re doing?

Kirk himself said that empathy was destroying the world, why do we need to feel empathy for that asshole now?!

what, youre taking advice from charlie kirk now?

I’m glad all is fine and good for you as long Americans get theirs. Who cares the suffering we dole out to the rest of the world to keep that high quality of life at the expense of everyone else? That attitude is literally exactly the kind of apathy I’m referring to. Keep smugly acting like it will get better when no real effective organizing is going on.

Don’t come crying to me when your “the arc of history bends towards justice” bullshit fails to be reality. Kissinger died comfortably in his bed, bending towards justice my ass…

good catch. i only read the last sentence. im getting tired and aughta take a break from internet for a bit.

top-notch meme. carry on.

it’s an oil painting…

Poe’s law is an adage of Internet culture which says that, without a clear indicator of the author’s intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views.

you go do palm beach county. ice is hiring. be the change you want to see in the world.

not drawing head and limbs was an intentional choice by the artist and it is as valid to examine that choice as it is the choice of breast shape and size. you may disagree with my speculation as to the reason he would have chosen to depict that child sex object void of all agency and expression, but you can’t possibly deny that that’s not the way you depict a person when you value their life or humanity.

and what in the fuck makes you think for one red second i would extend to donald “the john” trump a good faith presumption of innocence? every single time i’ve thought he has found the last depth of depravity i have found him colonizing a new level of hell within a week. I’m not downplaying childrape, intentionally or otherwise, by suggesting there’s motive means and opportunity to dispose of the evidence afterwards too. i don’t think most people would agree that “child rape” seems mundane in comparison to “child rape and also lupara bianca” when they think about the proposition in those terms. that is assuming your skeptic reaction is right and the “mundane” truth is that donald has only threatend, coerced, and bribed his victims into silence.

wsj previously released an article stating that this letter exists and explaining the circumstances that of its origin. this article releases an actual copy of the letter which wsj previously did not have direct access to, but at the time only saw and reported on what they saw of the image, which is now released. does that clear it up?

i wrote an opinion of that image in another post, which since the op which has apparently since been removed, i’ll copy and spiff up a bit here:

yes, you’ve seen the indication of breast buds, but if that’s all you noticed then you’re missing the most damning part, in my opinion. did you notice the palpably explicit dismemberment? the arms aren’t cut off by the page boundaries. they’re depicted as amputated. the torso is depicted as headless and legless; but rather than amputated they are simply cut off- missing, empty.

and no face.

a headless, limbless, torso. donald’s name on the cunt and a particularly revolting union of their thin, slimy mobster-pretext all over the belly. what a fucking enigma.

you’re all missing the most important part, in my opinion. yes, you’ve seen the indication of breast buds, but has anyone noticed the not-even-implied dismemberment? the arms aren’t cut off by the page. they’re depicted as amputated. the torso is depicted as headless and legless. instead, a bare cunt with donald’s name on it where legs should be.

and no face.

a headless, limbless, torso. donald’s name on the cunt and both their names all over the body. two men who have certain things in common. a secret that never ages.

You know what would be more to life if you had everything already? Being able to get rid of the evidence of anything.