“Staying and gumming up the works” could literally be interpreted as treason. Which is probably one of, if not the, most severe crime a citizen can commit.
The correct thing to do is make your stance crystal clear, let it be known for the record, and if that forces you into retirement, then at least there will be articles about it, like this one. And that shapes public opinion.
She also says they would routinely go by and bang the bars, flash their flashlights and force them all to stand up, in the middle of the night.
Torture by removing sleep, keeping the prisoners in a constant state of exhaustion.
They’ve been like that from the start pretty much. They assasinated Folke Bernadotte 1948. Why? Because he was a skilled diplomat who made real progress in the Israel - arab conflict.
Folke Bernadotte, who helped saved thousands of jews from concentration camps.
Oh please. You’re gonna blame their actions on “the war”?
War doesn’t make animals of men. It gives the animals an opportunity to do what they always wanted to do.
That is a facinating take the active genocide taking place in Gaza, carried out by Israel.
Israel isn’t sending it because they’re nice. They’re sending it because it’s a 30 year old system and they want new equipment. And it also makes them look slightly better. Though it would be difficult to look any worse for them.
They’re not becoming indebted. It’s part of US Israel talks. The system is 30 years old, they need to replace it regardless.
Sending it to Ukraine is preferable than sending it to a landfill.
Yeah, that’s an interesting point. Perhaps there are cultural difference that makes it more difficult to let go of old grudges.
Or maybe Europe is just more used to fighting eachother and becoming friends again once it’s over.
I mean, I’m Swedish, we may joke about the Danes and talk shit about them. But if something serious were to actually happen we’d stand behind them no questions asked. And I’m pretty sure we have the record for most wars and battles fought between two nations.
Yeah well, it’s not always easy to be friends when one invades and commit countless of atrocities against the other.
I’ve never seen an “allergy warning”. But like I said. Ingredients are always listed under the dish.
What part of his comment made you think he’s a shill for big business and pushing for deregulation?
It’s not required in Sweden at least. But most menus will list ingredients or descriptions so you know what you’re ordering. I dunno, it’s never been a problem…
This sounds like California is just going to get a repeat of “prop 65”.
I can see how everything will have an asterisk that reads “may contain trace amounts of, bla, bla, bla, etc…”
I’m not going to say I know exactly how the process is made. But I know forgeiners can open bank accounts without having a Swedish personnummer. Provided you have a good reason to do so. E.g. employment as the classic example. But being a student should also be a good reason.
In essence. They just want to make sure you’re not laundering money. That is their biggest concern.
Also, I would recommend that you take it easy at first on your transfers. I don’t know if the Swedish bank can handle dollars or if they will automatically exchange it to SEK, but it’s currently semi-stable at about ~9.6SEK per USD, coming down from an all time high of ~11SEK per USD at the start of the year. Make of that as you will. But it’s worth keeping in mind to decide when and how much you want to transfer at a time.
That’s a very tough situation. You’re right that you can’t do much without a BankID these days.
You can always get proper medical aid. Though as a non EU citizen you’ll have to pay full price for your visit and potential medication.
But you should be able to open a bank account despite not having a personnummer. Assuming you have a valid US Passport, it should be possible. You’ll have to visit a bank in person and bring your passport and explain why you need a bank account and how you intend to use it. Explaining that you are a student here and need to transfer forgein funds from your american bank in order to be able to pay for expenses should be a valid reason.
the US doesn’t want Canada and Denmark.
Trump speaking nonsense just to get attention for the sake of getting attention is a different matter than what the US actually want.
Not to mention that it’s never been about wanting Denmark. It’s about putting Military bases on Greenland. Which they already have under a current agreement. And the US isn’t even reaching the quota of the current agreement.
It doesn’t matter what Trump says. The US is not going to just casually invade a fellow NATO member. And Canada isn’t going to either. Especially not over Mexico.
So you see why it would matter less to Europe?
Why what would matter less to Europe? Are you trying to say that just because Russia already had access to the Black Sea, that it somehow wouldn’t matter to Europe that they invaded Ukraine and violated their sovereignty?
Either you’re on something you shouldn’t be. Or you’re off something you shouldn’t be. Whatever it is. Good luck.
Yes. Thank you. So please explain how the US would have anything to do, with granting them access via that route. If anything. It looks like it’s up to Finland, Norway, Iceland and Denmark to exert control over what is right next to their maritime border.
The note on the black sea was about Crimea They don’t need Crimea to have access to the black sea. They already had access to it.
What are you even talking about? Russia already have access to the Black Sea. And have had since the birth of their country.
And what do you even mean “give them control” of the North Atlantic? When was the last time you looked at a map of the globe?
Ehm… I disagree. Everyone would see it as a first strike. Because that’s what it is.
Canada has no military alliance with Mexico as far as I know.
I honestly can’t believe you put the words “be realistic about it” in the context of Canada striking the US.
If Europe didn’t do more than sending weapons to Ukraine. Why would they do anything more to Canada? Which, would be logistically, an almost impossible task.
Canada isn’t a smuggle route worth billions.
The only reason they could even potentially go into Mexico is due to the Cartels and their billion dollar drug trade. (I don’t have facts saying it’s a billion dollar drug trade. But I’m making an educated guess that’s it’s worth a shit ton of money)
There is just no way in hell Canada would ever strike first on the US and be the aggressor. Even if Canada would strike at the US, why the hell would Europe side with Canada? They are now the aggressor. Attacking a fellow NATO member no less.
My first thought before reading the article was; Oh, he has to step down due to not vetting targets enough and sinking ships he shouldn’t have.
After reading the article; Oh, he has to step down because he’s probably not sinking enough ships.