

stop platforming (making relevant) this person through posting soot like this.
wiki-user: Aatube
Now mostly on @[email protected] . I use this account as a backup.


stop platforming (making relevant) this person through posting soot like this.


iirc the eu funds impounded due to democratic backsliding are worth more than the oil crisis, not to mention they can actually pass the wealth tax immediately with their new supermajority unlike biden’s plan and the divided senate


i mean it makes sense for how our courts currently work: a combined judiciary and prosecutorial branch would break the adversarial system


Newsweek has always been a questionable source since its purchase by the notorious IBT. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Newsweek_(2013-present)


Alternative theory: Western news’s emphasis on this made more people (on Polymarket, the poll in question) aware that Orbán was actually being challenged. I’m not sure if that holds true for voting Hungarians.


tl;dr: the BBC article removed this sentence from the quote they used and this blogger noticed it


the new thing here is that not from the progressive caucus but an establishment democrat:
In 2025, Larson rejected calls to step aside amidst “generational change” and concerns over his age while facing multiple serious primary challengers after suffering a complex partial seizure on the House floor in February.
For the first time since 1999, Larson faces serious Democratic challengers [for 2026].


all of those from this term were from the progressive caucus


“together with” (not “together, with… instituted”) means ze wants both to be done away with, not the former replaced with the latter


i wonder how many “fun” pictures the AFP does have


an incredibly bizarre story that isn’t true, unless leavitt is that long-foretold slayer of the cuccoo


lol i’m not a professional guy either i’m just an enthusiast who learns things but thanks!


the agency was “made aware” that the White House did not like the photo, but stressed that the decision to remove the image was “an internal editorial one, based on our standard quality and selection criteria” and that there was no external pressure.
For what it’s worth, as an amateur photographer I agree. It’s a very weird image of Karoline Leavitt towering over a turkey and—as the oblique angle suggests—threateningly.


ever wonder why every coin says “liberty” in some random spot? the coinage act of 1792 mandates that all coins must depict liberty because the US framers did not like “too monarch-like” effigies, so the people in the 1900s just called it a day by slapping onto Amerindians and historical figures the word LIBERTY
/j


okay!


we do, though? fossil fuel prices soaring is real and something fossil fuels from Russia could fix EDIT: i replied before you edited and i now see that your edit addresses this, nevermind
i agree with your point that most of the west had nothing to do with starting the Iran bombings though


the US and Israel do not represent the entire West. this is Israel and Trump’s war and nothing more


rank and file is only a small part of the article, though? way way more is about the reasons in revenue sources, “first they came for Anthropic”, and OpenAI’s opportunism. i don’t think any previous things like “gulf of america” have caused this kind of open-letter response


that is indeed in this very article. please read the last paragraphs
and posting what we already know they’d do makes them leave us alone?