You are a hard working troll, so enjoy your trolling alone.

1. Which part of the post exactly? You are clearly lying here, you are just trying to create shit from nothing.
2. Which make the current post bad and unfactual because of what exactly???

Dear Flying Squid, read more to improve yourself.

Here is a good link for you to read: Ad hominem.

Here is a good quote from there:

Often currently this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent’s character or background.

1. Can you quote the part where I am “defending a Nazi.”.
2. What the hell does me as a person have to do with the post?

You are hopeless, you want to just keep arguing without reason.

The bias in Reuters is that they don’t show any potential factors that may have affected this and they don’t show in the headline or the first paragraph the “low confidence” part.

Reuters: CIA now says COVID-19 ‘more likely’ to have come from lab.

First paragraph: The Central Intelligence Agency has assessed that the COVID-19 pandemic is “more likely” to have emerged from a lab rather than from nature, an agency spokesperson said on Saturday.

So…what is your point here exactly?

You did not show any problems in the article, what are you looking for here exactly?

See for yourself;

New York Times: C.I.A. Now Favors Lab Leak Theory to Explain Covid’s Origins.

Here is the first paragraph: A new analysis that began under the Biden administration is released by the C.I.A.’s new director, John Ratcliffe, who wants the agency to get “off the sidelines” in the debate.

What kind of non answer is this.

Is the article factually correct or not?

Does it show any uneeded biases?

What crap exactly?

Paywalled article, I can’t read it.

Squid game “the real life version”