They seem to think that this is going to screw over the Iranian civilians, who are all terrorists, who Trump said he’d support, and who he is now betraying by negotiating with the Iranian government, who are also terrorists. So their position is we shouldn’t have a deal with terrorists, because we should have a deal with terrorists.
That’s… that’s gotta be an LLM. There’s no actual reasoning there.
I’m so confused by that last one.
They seem to think that this is going to screw over the Iranian civilians, who are all terrorists, who Trump said he’d support, and who he is now betraying by negotiating with the Iranian government, who are also terrorists. So their position is we shouldn’t have a deal with terrorists, because we should have a deal with terrorists.
That’s… that’s gotta be an LLM. There’s no actual reasoning there.
They are so close to getting it, and then it goes off the rails.
Also, another post there said this absolute gem:
"So, as usual from Republicans, very little accomplished at our expense.
We need a real party that will fully oppose Democrats."
Like… what!!! It’s almost impressive the depth of insanity they could pack into 21 words.