There are tariffs on Chinese EVs in the EU as well.

It’s mostly about no longer letting Russia have access to the Baltic sea any more. They’ve done more than enough bad shit there to be put in permanent timeout at this point. What to do with the land after that is secondary

Calling it now: literally only gooners will be interested in this character, no one else will care

Sounds like an efficient way to lose Königsberg, Karelia and Crimea very quickly.

Is the organization in the room with us right now?

It’s probably best not to make assumptions before we know for sure.

Same as the motivations behind Charlie Kirk’s shooter should not have been assumed to have been either left or right until we know for sure.

Not saying I disagree with the statement, but where did you see that these men were Republicans? I didn’t find any reference to any political motivation in the article, but I also didn’t read it particularly thoroughly

She ratfucked it at the last second, delaying implementation and then when she brought it back post-election she lowered the prices, which dug a massive hole into the MTAs budget, which relied on that projected revenue for their future investments.

To be clear, I am all for congestion pricing. I live in one of the cities where it has been successfully implemented.

This is giving Hochul too much credit.

Have you already forgotten the congestion pricing debacle?

It’s good that she did this, but by no means should she be forgiven or continue to work in her position

An interesting point - I checked, and as far as I can tell, non-citizens can be charged with treason in the U.K, so long as they are considered under the jurisdiction of the U.K - “alien residents” for example are covered, and probably temporary visitors to the country as well. It would likely be up to judicial interpretation whether attempting the coup virtually would qualify, but I’d assume it might.

The serious take would be that this comment is too mild to qualify for treason, but one could always hope.

They are already wildly uncompetitive on account of having flubbed the EV transition, China already beat them solidly on all accounts. Why should they be given anything they ask for?

Cool. Charge him with treason and throw him in jail if he ever decides to pay the U.K a visit again, then.

No, the old model does not have the training data. It only has “model weights”. You can conceptualize those as the abstract rules that the old model learned when it read the training data. By design, they are not supposed to memorize their training data.

I expressed myself poorly, this is what I meant - it has the “essence” of the training data, but of course not the verbatim training data.

To outperform the old model, the new model needs more than what the old model learned. It needs primary sources, ie the training data itself. Which is going to be deleted.

I wonder how valuable in relative terms the old training data is to the process, compared to just the new training data. I can’t answer it, but it would be interesting to know.

I think we’re in agreement with each other? The old model has the old training data, and then you train a new one on that model with new training data, right?

I guess it depends on how important old data is when building upon new models, which I fully admit I don’t know the answer to. As I understand it though, new models are not trained fully from scratch, but instead are a continuation of the older model trained with new techniques/new data.

To speculate, I guess not having the older data present in the new training stages might make the attributes of that data be less pronounced in the new output model.

Maybe they could cheat the system by trying to distill that data out of the older models and put that into the training data, but I guess the risk of model collapse is not-insignificant there

Again, limited understanding here, take everything I speculate with a grain of salt

They essentially still have the information in the weights, so I guess they won’t fret too much over not having it in the original training data.

Critical support to…

…Erdogan?

Chuck a bombilla filled with mate at him

The article claims it’s partially down to Casas Particulares not being able to be listed on home rental sites, along with U.S tourists not being able to visit. There’s a video as well which I’m sure provides more reasons

Humans have been cooking with fire for a bloody long time, and we’ve gotten very good at making it safe. I’d wager that this is just energy companies lobbying against gas, as they can make more money burning coal/oil to power electric stoves.

The opposite is true actually with the gas companies having been behind the Cooking with Gas-campaign in order to make sure that they keep getting gas line installations in place.

Indoor combustion is still very much detrimental for health, trying to claim otherwise is quite frankly absurd.